Peer Review Week 2016 – A summary

During last week it was Peer Review Week. The theme was ”Recognition for Review”. Here on the Stockholm University Press Blog, we published interviews with scholars from different disciplines based at Stockholm University, and who shared their thoughts about peer review. Published posts on the Stockholm University Press Blog during Peer Review Week 2016 Stockholm … More Peer Review Week 2016 – A summary

”We need though to discuss more on what is meant with a ‘well done peer-review´” #peerrevw16

As we wrote before we are celebrating Peer Review Week 2016 by focusing on the theme “recognition for review”. Our aim this Peer Review Week will be to publish interviews with scholars from different disciplines at Stockholm University. Today we publish a short interview with Andres Rivarola, Ph.D., Associate Professor at Institute of Latin American … More ”We need though to discuss more on what is meant with a ‘well done peer-review´” #peerrevw16

“Personally I have always seen double-blind peer-reviewing as the way to go to ensure complete honesty from reviewers who may be faced with the need to write an unfavourable review” #peerrevw16

As we wrote before we are celebrating Peer Review Week 2016 by focusing on the theme “recognition for review”. Our aim this Peer Review Week will be to publish interviews with scholars from different disciplines at Stockholm University. Today we publish a short interview with Nils-Lennart Johannesson, Professor at the Department of English at Stockholm … More “Personally I have always seen double-blind peer-reviewing as the way to go to ensure complete honesty from reviewers who may be faced with the need to write an unfavourable review” #peerrevw16

A researcher driven publisher should give recognition for review #peerrevw16 #recognizereview part 2

Blog post by Christina Lenz and Sofie Wennström. Read part 1 here. Why we do peer review the way we do The peer review process is famous (or infamous?) for taking a long of time and to include a significant effort for all involved – the authors, editors and the editorial boards alike. The purpose … More A researcher driven publisher should give recognition for review #peerrevw16 #recognizereview part 2

”The threat is that the core of the publishing process is invisible and never recognised at any level” #peerrevwk16

As we wrote before we are celebrating Peer Review Week 2016 by focusing on the theme ”recognition for review”. Our aim this Peer Review Week will be to publish interviews with scholars from different disciplines at Stockholm University. Today we publish a short interview with Peter Jansson, Professor at Department of Physical Geography, Editor-in-Chief Georg. … More ”The threat is that the core of the publishing process is invisible and never recognised at any level” #peerrevwk16

A researcher driven publisher should give recognition for review #peerrevw16 part I

Stockholm University Press are proud to celebrate Peer Review Week 2016, and as a start of this week’s activities we would like to focus on the peer review process we apply for book projects and journals, and how that relates to the theme “Recognition for Peer Review”. We will describe what, how and why we … More A researcher driven publisher should give recognition for review #peerrevw16 part I